Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑
@cryptoforchange
IMO the path higher is going down is too passive. Too much of just sitting back and saying “hey you can come build on top of h”. Higher needs to turn the switch and become aggressive in seeking talent and PAYING for it. I don’t know exactly what the best flow for this is… could be focusing on some listings.. could be focusing on finding accounts on X who have influence. Could be trying to onboard some well known builders to higher… prolly all these need to happen and fast.
6 replies
1 recast
22 reactions
CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑
@cryptoforchange
https://warpcast.com/martin/0x9d054297 Example here, asking for people to just do this level of work without any pay. Like I get they can hold the token and go do these things to pump their bags but that is a lot of risk without any guarantee of reward. If it was a big opportunity people would be chomping at the bit to lead these roles. We have to do better and aim higher.
3 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑
@cryptoforchange
Also my blood is almost boiling that over on X and other socials when people see the running horse image they don't think about higher... plus when they hear people talk aethernet they think about $LUM Like HOW did we drop the ball here so bad. 😤
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
↑ antaur ツ
@antaur.eth
greed?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑
@cryptoforchange
How so?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
↑ antaur ツ
@antaur.eth
don't have proof but felt like some higher holders were rotating into $LUM and others. I mean all the liquidity from aether--launched clankers has to come from somewhere, no?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
aether won, that's all that matters
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Clankers are all single sided liquidity. But yeah aether should have earned a ton of fees on it. If we can leverage that to fund higher x lum activities would be great
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
