Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Andy Jagoe pfp
Andy Jagoe
@andyjagoe
GDP/capita in the US would be $100-200k instead of $65k if we had stayed on the Adams curve we should be using more energy, not less
5 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

Andy Jagoe pfp
Andy Jagoe
@andyjagoe
there's no such thing as a rich country that consumes little energy
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Giuliano Giacaglia pfp
Giuliano Giacaglia
@giu
We should πŸ’― focus on making energy cheaper and producing more energy! From nuclear to coal. We should make more energy!
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Ed O'Shaughnessy pfp
Ed O'Shaughnessy
@eddieosh
Yes, and we have already hit peak oil production. There are as yet no viable alternatives (high density, high transportability) to hydrocarbons. The faster we burn the faster the "Seneca Cliff" approaches. This is a systemic problem but there seems no genuine effort to invest in real alternatives to hydrocarbons.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Stuart pfp
Stuart
@olystuart
And we'd be even more dead to climate chaos than we're looking now, which is pretty grim. We have major emissions and supply problems to solve first before we step up to the next era of energy consumption increases. I hope we do figure it out in time!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

lucas  pfp
lucas
@elesel.eth
fr turn on the taps, give humanity energy
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions