Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Andy Jagoe
@andyjagoe
@benersing @jess - i think /venturecapital may have two distinct audiences: -founders who want to raise funds and connect with VCs and VCs who want to connect with founders -VCs who want to learn about fund formation, raising from LPs, regulatory, and the business of VC wonder if these should be separate channels?
6 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Ben 🟪
@benersing
Its a good push. I've wrestled with that for a while and decided to keep them together since so many founders often want to better understand the business of VC. I'm also a strong believer in breaking down traditional silo's and fostering lateral thinking / discussion.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Jess Sloss e/enj
@jess
For me personally, I love the idea of this channel being focused on the business of VC vs VC/Founder connections. I think if we do it well, this channel could be incredibly valuable to founders who want to better understand how VC works and how we think. Its a category thats often seen as a black box to founders.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Ben 🟪
@benersing
2000 $degen for a great question
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ben 🟪
@benersing
Let's see what founders say. https://warpcast.com/benersing/0xefbeec76
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Layne
@layne
VC/Founder intros could easily be a dedicated channel, everything else related to VC/fund industry talk may be interesting to founders but is a completely separate topic and would make the channel harder to navigate.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mike Fiuk
@michalfiuk
Think these are actually mutually reinforcing groups, no? Folks that are interested in one might also benefit from the other convo, or am I thinking about it the wrong way?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
