Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

lucky pfp
lucky
@lsankar.eth
increasingly bullish on TEEs
2 replies
2 recasts
48 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Can you say more? I am still concerned about relying on custom hardware that has a history of vulnerabilities
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

lucky pfp
lucky
@lsankar.eth
I see 'trust chip/cloud provider' as an intermediate trust assumption b/w 'trust anon dev' and 'trust no one' certainly risk there (and I want FHE to be performant, it's just not yet for what i want to do), but feels 10x better than 'trust anon dev' also TEEs seem to be picking up in dev/ecosystem energy
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
The former point makes a lot of sense. It’s practical and real-world oriented The latter is what I worry about It feels like we’re psyching ourselves out about weak technology (https://cdixon.org/2019/01/08/strong-and-weak-technologies) and hope it doesn’t block investment / attention into software based solutions to the same problems (eg. FHE)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

lucky pfp
lucky
@lsankar.eth
good point
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction