Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

makemake  pfp
makemake
@makemake
EIP1559 and it's consequences have been a disaster for ethereum and account abstraction
3 replies
6 recasts
70 reactions

typeof.eth 🔵 pfp
typeof.eth 🔵
@typeof.eth
Do you think EIPs 3074 and 7702 address the issue that 1559 introduced? First party support for sponsored EOA transactions sounds like a good thing to me
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
7702 seems like it’s meant to replace 3074 but functionally do the same thing Think it will be a big step forward for EOAs to feel more like “smart accounts”
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

typeof.eth 🔵 pfp
typeof.eth 🔵
@typeof.eth
Yeah, agreed! It sounds like the way to do sponsored transactions before had you submitting them to a specific validator; this way anyone can sponsor 🤘
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction