Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Leo 🪴🎩 pfp
Leo 🪴🎩
@sha25leo.eth
I believe the best way to launch a miniapp is this one. Thanks to @haole for helping me test this feature! @dwr.eth @horsefacts.eth @v
3 replies
4 recasts
17 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
Andrei O.
@andrei0x309
Like I said a while back Iframe in simple action should be allowed to make mini apps possible, I mean it's at the client level so clients can already do that if they want. The main idea is that allowing Iframe only in composer action, will not work for most cases as there are more cases when you don't need to modify the contents of the cast, and you want to do something unrelated to the cast.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Leo 🪴🎩 pfp
Leo 🪴🎩
@sha25leo.eth
I strongly agree. In my case, what I need more is to display rankings and open the game through a frame, which would make viral spread more likely.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
Andrei O.
@andrei0x309
100/100 The only case against Iframe in simple actions is that can lead to user leaching when users will stop using the main client and go directly to the app in the frame as time passes. But I mean in web3, in theory, we should not try to silo users though unfortunately, that's happening a lot.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Leo 🪴🎩 pfp
Leo 🪴🎩
@sha25leo.eth
No matter which app users navigate to, they ultimately remain on Farcaster. By enabling iframe functionality, we can actually explore more ways to combine community interaction with mini-apps.
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction