Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Anatcrypto ποΈποΈπ©
@anatcrypto.eth
Judging by the loud cries of millions of sybils on Twitter, zkSync chose the optimal criteria for filtering them out. Is holding $100 in the ecosystem for a year not a fair criterion for a regular user? In other airdrops, it might be POH with a well-established Farcaster or Lens profile. Are you ready for such changes?
24 replies
0 recast
47 reactions
Tatiansa πͺπ£. ββ¨-β¨
@tatiansa
I believe that combining all criteria would be fair. But the logic of rewarding people who received a drop for receiving a drop is unclear to me. The criterion of interaction with profiles and channels on social networks would probably be more appropriate than rewarding users who did not even know about the existence of Zksync.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Anatcrypto ποΈποΈπ©
@anatcrypto.eth
Yeah, that's a common viewpoint among users who didn't get the airdrop. But in crypto, you need to think several years ahead. The social capital of Social Fi pioneers could help bring the next billion users to zkSync.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tatiansa πͺπ£. ββ¨-β¨
@tatiansa
Yes, but itβs unfair to the already existing community that supported the development of the network, thatβs a fact. I agree with the opinion regarding future users, but I do not agree with the distribution scheme (does not concern me specifically).
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction