Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Anatcrypto πŸ—οΈπŸŽ™οΈπŸŽ© pfp
Anatcrypto πŸ—οΈπŸŽ™οΈπŸŽ©
@anatcrypto.eth
Judging by the loud cries of millions of sybils on Twitter, zkSync chose the optimal criteria for filtering them out. Is holding $100 in the ecosystem for a year not a fair criterion for a regular user? In other airdrops, it might be POH with a well-established Farcaster or Lens profile. Are you ready for such changes?
24 replies
0 recast
47 reactions

kohta 🎩 βŒβ—¨-β—¨ 🐹 pfp
kohta 🎩 βŒβ—¨-β—¨ 🐹
@kohta
I do not fully agree with you. 1) Criteria looks so difficult to follow them if you don’t know them (100$ isn’t the only one criteria). So it looks like the team or closest people will get airdrop. 2) They almost didn’t filter Sybils. There were very simple restrictions for Sybils. 3) A small amount of wallets gets a huge part of tokens (doesn’t look like decentralisation)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Anatcrypto πŸ—οΈπŸŽ™οΈπŸŽ© pfp
Anatcrypto πŸ—οΈπŸŽ™οΈπŸŽ©
@anatcrypto.eth
I agree with you if you look at it from your point of view. But the sybils that I follow on telegram and who sold software for sybils say that this is just a disaster.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction