Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Amir Bandeali pfp
Amir Bandeali
@amir
Sharing an idea I had a while ago since we're seriously talking about $nouns: You can decompose a noun into a fungible token (w/ gov rights) and an NFT (similar image, no gov rights). A combined noun can potentially have some extra benefit/rights. Good idea or more complexity than it's worth?
6 replies
2 recasts
27 reactions

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
maybe share a bit on what you thought might be the desired use case of such decomposition?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
Are you imagining a different fungible token for each Noun you decompose?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Shila73 pfp
Shila73
@shila
Like you pls flw and like me
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

baker  pfp
baker
@wardlaw
What about a noun owned by a party ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ting.⌐◨-◨ pfp
ting.⌐◨-◨
@ting
@dotnouns Based on current $NOGS rewards: - 40% holding - NFT owner - 60% activity - Could rewards go to delegates for voting instead of the NFT owner?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

hamed_woodart pfp
hamed_woodart
@billieilish
6 $DEGEN for you my friend
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction