Network States

I want to know what the sentiment on this topic is here.

Should cities be driven by the common good or by profit?

Only the followers of /network-states  channel can vote

I want to know what the sentiment on this topic is here.

Should cities be driven by the common good or by profit?

Only the followers of /network-states  channel can vote

https://frame.vote/mYLYXrwd

@vocdoni, prev. Bitcoin Magazine | Purple #203 | Cohost: /diy /anthropology /vote /biohacking /cooperatives

Both approaches will exist and be better than the establishment, like closed and open source.

But I think a decentralized strategy where "profit" is shared to token holders that invested or live in the city will prevail.

Founder Peerbase.
Producing the docuseries about network states and startup societies https://startupsociety.film.

I agree that cities should be more open, and we need to rethink them. 

However, regarding decentralized for-profit cities how would you prevent the city's first residents and the most successful ones, who accumulate most of the tokens (and perhaps even investment groups entering a some point to help expand the city), from acting against the interests of new citizens, immigrants and future generations who have few or no tokens, and therefore no say in the governance of the place where they live?

I pray everyday that they don’t actually ever implement any kind of plutocratic tokenized governance…

But privatizing and profiting from government service to an even greater, more exploitative manner seems to be the logical next evolution of neoliberalism into complete techno neofeudalism