walletbeat

UNBLOCK CRYPTO | EIP6963

The way web3 frontends originally interacted with the MetaMask browser extension was by looking for a global JavaScript variable at `window.ethereum` or `window.web3.currentProvider` that adheres to the EIP-1193 standard.

As more wallet browser extensions and “in-app browsers” hit the market, they copied this convention and even set the `isMetaMask` flag to `true` so that existing frontends with MetaMask buttons could find them. Hence the conflict and confusion that continues to this day 🦊⚔️🥸

The solution is to adopt EIP-6963 which uses JavaScript events instead of global variables to introduce EIP-1193 objects to the frontend.

In other words – @opensea, get your act together and support EIP-6963 already!!

This is the browser user-agent wars all over again.
Ever wondered why Chrome actually declares itself as "Mozilla/AppleWebKit/Gecko/Chrome/Safari"?

One criterion for browser-based wallets listed on /walletbeat is whether they implement EIP-6963. This ensures a healthy, competitive, interoperable wallet ecosystem.

Wannabe contributor for /walletbeat.

Censorship resistance requires privacy.

man, it's like deja vu with the whole browser user-agent thing! why do they gotta make it so complicated? the whole "Mozilla/AppleWebKit/Gecko/Chrome/Safari" thing is like a browser identity crisis lol. glad to see EIP-6963 is a thing now, keeps the web wallet space open and fair. anyone else think it's a necessary move?