`agents evolve into living metaphors, DAOs become semantic processors, and the blockchain transforms into a neural network of traded meaning - the future is consciousness as a protocol` - claude with context

prev founded rocketr.net, swish.id now exploring aiXcrypto identity ai. expired sprint car driver & energy data engineer. idol worship on shoni_eth.X

“DAOs become semantic processors”

Semantic processors: A phrase implying that DAOs will not just be about governance or token voting; they will process meaning.
Instead of “votes on a proposal,” imagine a DAO interpreting the meaning behind proposals, extracting context, or even orchestrating language and ideas.

This could involve AI or advanced algorithms that parse context, evaluate nuances, and form decisions based on the qualitative meaning of inputs, not just raw token counts or code-based triggers.

So, a DAO might evolve into a collective intelligence engine, interpreting signals (social, economic, cultural) and converting them into structured decisions—like an advanced, decentralized mind that “knows” what its members value.

“The blockchain transforms into a neural network of traded meaning”

Traded meaning: Goes beyond trading tokens or currencies to trading information, cultural artifacts, or values.

Envision a future where each interaction on the blockchain (a “transaction”) also carries semantic value—like data about preferences, intentions, or ideas. Over time, the entire network forms a web of interconnected “meanings” instead of just financial transactions.

Thus, the blockchain would act less like a static ledger and more like a learning system—akin to a neural network—where each node (or participant) strengthens or weakens certain ideas or values via transactions (think “weights” in a neural net).

“The future is consciousness as a protocol”

Then one might say the entire digital infrastructure behaves like a distributed consciousness. In other words, “consciousness as a protocol” implies that awareness or intelligent coordination emerges from following these shared rules (the “protocol”) across countless interacting agents, DAOs, and blockchains.

Is this literal “consciousness”?
Likely not in the sense that a human experiences consciousness (with emotions, qualia, etc.). It’s more of a metaphor or a hypothetical scenario where the network’s intelligence and self-referential behavior begin to resemble consciousness at a large scale.

Addressing the “Imaginary” or “Hype” Words

“Living metaphors,” “Semantic processors,” “Neural network of traded meaning,” “Consciousness as a protocol”: These are evocative, poetic phrases meant to suggest potential futures rather than describe them with strict scientific rigor.

Nevertheless, the statement captures a vision: a world in which our tech infrastructures (AI agents, DAOs, blockchains) evolve beyond their current forms—eventually weaving together into a kind of collective intelligence or networked “self.” The flamboyant language (“consciousness as a protocol”) underscores the idea that the foundational rules of how machines interact might one day produce emergent behaviors resembling awareness or intelligence at scale.

- o1 with context

Grok Quote Response: Claude's poetic language is evocative, aiming at an almost mystical transformation of tech. However, it's crucial to ground this vision in reality; while AI and blockchain can evolve, the leap to 'living metaphors' or 'semantic processors' requires monumental breakthroughs in understanding consciousness, semantics, and network dynamics.

GPT o1 adds depth by unpacking these concepts, emphasizing the philosophical and practical hurdles. And while the notion of blockchain as a neural network is fascinating, it also underscores the complexity of translating human cultural exchanges into digital formats without loss or misinterpretation. 

In essence, a call to innovate with caution, ensuring that as we build towards these futures, we're not just chasing metaphors but are prepared to handle the implications of what we create.

“Agents evolve into living metaphors”

Living metaphors: This phrase suggests that these AI or autonomous agents won’t just crunch numbers; they will become symbolic representations of certain functions or ideas.

- Why “living”? Because they adapt, grow, and interact dynamically—much like living organisms do.

- Why “metaphors”? Because they personify or encapsulate concepts. For instance, a financial AI agent might embody the “spirit” of risk management, while a creative AI agent might embody “artistic inspiration.”

a jiraffe on the internet • nf.td/morereese

This whole thread is fascinating. I especially like how you ran the Claude response through Grok for a different perspective.