At last the debate arrives at our hidden presuppositions!

@vijay believes that a 70% cashback parameter will promote more participation in AF than an e.g. 30% cashback parameter, and therefore will produce more revenue overall for *some* channels.

I believe the number of subscribers in my channel is a result of *my* hard work, not $ALFA games. I don't need the gamification - my game is delivering cold, hard content 👊

So this is why I'm annoyed that my work is being potentially discounted down 70%, and why @vijay is annoyed *his* work to build an active subscriber base is being discounted by me in turn.

Specifically, the 70% parameter would need to consistently bring in 2.6x more subscribers with the e.g. 30% parameter for @vijay's argument to hold. Who's correct?

I think he and I are on the same page here -- it needs to be a configurable parameter which each channel can play with and discover what works best for themselves.

Interesante debate entre @rjs Y @vijay acerca de si cambiar el 70% de las suscripciones de un canal que se llevan los stakers.

Yo opino que es muy buena opción y que fuers configurable por el propietario del canal, pero con ciertos limites para evitar perjuicios a los suscriptores y stakers.

¿Se vendrán cambios en AF??

head of product @superfluid @alfafrens @superboring

vijay.info

Husband, dad, dev. I document what I see.

⭐ DEGEN Tips FAQ: https://paragraph.xyz/@rjs/degen-tips-ultimate-faq-v8 ⭐

Not financial advice or a recommendation.

Interesante debate entre @rjs Y @vijay acerca de si cambiar el 70% de las suscripciones de un canal que se llevan los stakers.

Yo opino que es muy buena opción y que fuers configurable por el propietario del canal, pero con ciertos limites para evitar perjuicios a los suscriptores y stakers.

¿Se vendrán cambios en AF??


https://warpcast.com/rjs/0xf9ba2d21

If they remove that cashback percentage, they'll turn an interesting model that combines elements of DeFi with subscriptions into a traditional Web2 subscription model that isn't working. There are many subscription systems through newsletters and others on Web2, where most of the money goes to the creator. Wouldn't keeping the current model, where subscribers get a share, incentivize more people to subscribe and support the platform? In the current model, I'm motivated by the content, but also by what I receive from my subscription. If it were only for the content, I'd only be subscribed to a maximum of 4 or 5 channels. I receive Alfa that I can invest in the channel I'm subscribed to, or in any other I would like to support to grow. It's a well-thought-out model. I support you, but I also receive something from that support.

Exploring web3 projects, learning every day.

Deje mi respuesta
https://warpcast.com/alexescd.eth/0xcd6c28e0

Learning javascript, reactjs, nextjs, graphql.

Llevo 3 horas en coche conduciendo.
Ahora me leo todo.