ian
@iandaos
If you assume that there will be infinite web3 social networks and our social graphs and attention fracture across dozens or hundreds of them, what is the end game? An aggregator? I'm just not sure how even as a user I manage all of these social graphs/networks unless they are hyper specialized.
10 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Aleksi Loytynoja
@aleksi
Given the hyper specialization (which I believe in), can't help but think that becoming the protocol that owns the social graph = backend will be veeeery valuable. Will fc/lens/deso/... discuss with one another, or will we see a race for the most adopted social graph?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ian
@iandaos
Can you own the social graph with hyper specialization?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Aleksi Loytynoja
@aleksi
In the hyper specialized world, your social graph is surely sliced to numerous clients context-specifically. Just thinking if there will be one massive back-end (like fc/lens) that dominates the market = will all these "micro social graphs" be built on top of the same big underlying social graph?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Aleksi Loytynoja
@aleksi
I kinda understand why it really makes sense to have a single identity that is then used for multiple profiles in different contexts. But in that case i believe we'll see a massive run to "own" this identity in their protocol
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ian
@iandaos
on the last point, there will def be power laws, but i'm not confident that's how web3 social networks will/should be built
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
