Father Morwen
@alditrus
I think the key to driving this understanding is to build products that normies actual need/want to use. The current problem with the space is were just building for cryptobros. It's too insulated and self referential.
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
I think that crypto or Blockchain is just the label on the apple. We talk more about the label than the apple, so people don't understand what we do or say. Also, we are mainly showcasing defi while there are lots of cases outside, not too many, but several. For example, we are building digital passports for vehicles using Blockchain technology. Do users need to know about it? I don't think so.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
🗿
@bias
that’s what happens when you are only capable of cultivating a toxic gecko chamber culture you have to ostracize the ‘non-believers’ to set examples for the unquestioning zealots eventually unquestioning zealots are all you’re left with, and unquestioning zealots are never the actual innovators or cultural producers and so you will only get trite and hollow “leaders” and “cultures” after emptying the critical minded from your lot
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Dirk Siebels
@disic
Yes, so true. Build something that is 10x better than anything that people use today. Nobody cares that it’s blockchain-based but people will notice it when that’s the only reason why it’s 10x better (or possible at all). Think about tokenization, decentralized ID and some other use cases.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction