Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

justin.framedl.eth pfp
justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
while i concede it's not the most intuitve ux, i loved composing this little experiment with @artlu's nifty new cast encoder (publically cast private messages to your audience) basically i cast-asked decoders to like my cast (https://warpcast.com/ahn.eth/0x5170ef0b) within the next 30 min; once the time was up i dropped 100 MOXIE each to the 6 accounts who took the time to decode & like (at least i hope they did that instead of just hitting like on a random string of numbers πŸ˜‚) using @quidli just thinking about more ways to permissionlessly ensure that users who want to incentivize engagement are able to do so with a little bit more protection from engagement farmers πŸ§‘β€πŸŒΎ
2 replies
1 recast
9 reactions

justin.framedl.eth pfp
justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
and details for how to get setup on message encoding/decoding, very kindly prepared by @hankmoody https://warpcast.com/hankmoody/0x588598b1
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

artlu is on lunchbreak! pfp
artlu is on lunchbreak!
@artlu
ty and well received! I think you dropped me my first Moxie πŸ™ƒ Note that only channel members can decode instructions in the cast. Does adding a channel members only rule make it even more farmer-proof, and/or give more levers of control to the Qudli Frame Drop user?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

justin.framedl.eth pfp
justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
i just used `like` in this instance as i didn't get too many likes within the time limit, but adding the `follower` parameter after would've actually been a good second buffer! will keep in mind for a future experimental drop
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

artlu is on lunchbreak! pfp
artlu is on lunchbreak!
@artlu
oh one more UX quirk to mention then -- the channel owner has to opt in to decoding Keccak256 in their channel first, otherwise all anyone should see is 4d95586647a5523ff1b2cbb36aa3f9e86516b6b808b65f218ccf66cf1b97dcbb
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction