Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Tay Zonday
@tayzonday
I just made the same post on Farcaster (184 followers at time of post), Facebook (67,000 followers) and Threads (5,515 followers). After 1-2 hours: Farcaster= 8 replies / 24 Likes Facebook= 4 likes Threads= 5 likes My actual reach on those platforms is just the tip of the Zuckerberg
105 replies
78 recasts
647 reactions
kk
@king
Curious why you left out twitter, the only contestant that’s actually alive in the mix 💀
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tay Zonday
@tayzonday
Because I suspected Twitter would get low engagement too. ALL other platforms punish you for low-engagement posts and demote your future organic reach. I didn’t want to offend my invisible Twitter credit score. What’s interesting is speculating WHY the post had low reach elsewhere— I’d go to more effort to do a full body photo holding the props if I wanted the recommendation engines to like me elsewhere. Those platforms are back-end comparing me with a predictive machine-learning AI to similar posts, and know that the posts with faces get higher click-through rate. Those platforms also Optical Character Recognize text in photos, and valuable brand keywords (like Cortizone) get specific organic reach *demotion* because they want advertisers to bid for reach against brand keywords. Limiting “free” reach inflates the keyword value of their ad marketplaces. There are a dozen other reasons a centralized, engagement optimized, ad driven feed demotes a post like that— but I’m out of space 😆
3 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Agadoo 🎩
@agadoo
The beauty here is - if you don’t like the current feed/how things are prioritised on Warpcast, can use another frontend app (e.g. supercast). Or even write your own. Underlying info on farcaster is the same (messages, usernames, follows, likes etc etc). It’s genius. Nearly as genius as #chocolaterain ❤️
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
