Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Tay Zonday
@tayzonday
I just made the same post on Farcaster (184 followers at time of post), Facebook (67,000 followers) and Threads (5,515 followers). After 1-2 hours: Farcaster= 8 replies / 24 Likes Facebook= 4 likes Threads= 5 likes My actual reach on those platforms is just the tip of the Zuckerberg
59 replies
111 recasts
754 reactions
Ahahahahahahaha
@king
Curious why you left out twitter, the only contestant thatās actually alive in the mix š
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tay Zonday
@tayzonday
Because I suspected Twitter would get low engagement too. ALL other platforms punish you for low-engagement posts and demote your future organic reach. I didnāt want to offend my invisible Twitter credit score. Whatās interesting is speculating WHY the post had low reach elsewhereā Iād go to more effort to do a full body photo holding the props if I wanted the recommendation engines to like me elsewhere. Those platforms are back-end comparing me with a predictive machine-learning AI to similar posts, and know that the posts with faces get higher click-through rate. Those platforms also Optical Character Recognize text in photos, and valuable brand keywords (like Cortizone) get specific organic reach *demotion* because they want advertisers to bid for reach against brand keywords. Limiting āfreeā reach inflates the keyword value of their ad marketplaces. There are a dozen other reasons a centralized, engagement optimized, ad driven feed demotes a post like thatā but Iām out of space š
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
Agadoo š©
@agadoo
The beauty here is - if you donāt like the current feed/how things are prioritised on Warpcast, can use another frontend app (e.g. supercast). Or even write your own. Underlying info on farcaster is the same (messages, usernames, follows, likes etc etc). Itās genius. Nearly as genius as #chocolaterain ā¤ļø
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
