Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Tay Zonday
@tayzonday
I just made the same post on Farcaster (184 followers at time of post), Facebook (67,000 followers) and Threads (5,515 followers). After 1-2 hours: Farcaster= 8 replies / 24 Likes Facebook= 4 likes Threads= 5 likes My actual reach on those platforms is just the tip of the Zuckerberg
105 replies
78 recasts
647 reactions
kk
@king
Curious why you left out twitter, the only contestant that’s actually alive in the mix 💀
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tay Zonday
@tayzonday
Because I suspected Twitter would get low engagement too. ALL other platforms punish you for low-engagement posts and demote your future organic reach. I didn’t want to offend my invisible Twitter credit score. What’s interesting is speculating WHY the post had low reach elsewhere— I’d go to more effort to do a full body photo holding the props if I wanted the recommendation engines to like me elsewhere. Those platforms are back-end comparing me with a predictive machine-learning AI to similar posts, and know that the posts with faces get higher click-through rate. Those platforms also Optical Character Recognize text in photos, and valuable brand keywords (like Cortizone) get specific organic reach *demotion* because they want advertisers to bid for reach against brand keywords. Limiting “free” reach inflates the keyword value of their ad marketplaces. There are a dozen other reasons a centralized, engagement optimized, ad driven feed demotes a post like that— but I’m out of space 😆
3 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
