Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

0xmons pfp
0xmons
@xmon.eth
a lot of existing onchain game design seems to favor automated players this seems especially true for games with resource harvesting (e.g. rts/idle style games) i think this often puts non-automated players (e.g. humans) at a disadvantage for people who can write bots, i'm sure the meta-game is fun. and you can provide tools to let most people interact with bots. b ut at that point, i think the game itself has changed--it's not about whatever underlying mechanics are interesting, but it's some optimization game on top ideally games made for human players have the scripting/automation happen somewhere upstream of the actual in-game mechanics (e.g. user generated content/worlds/npcs) rather than having them compete on the same field. excited to see more games explore along these veins
13 replies
35 recasts
318 reactions

AfroRick pfp
AfroRick
@afrorick
This is an extremely important observation. If "winning" is the fun factor and it is something that can easily automated - is it really a game or a programming assignment. But similarly, if the things that the players do isn't fun, but done as Sybil detection - it is similarly a failure.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction