adcv on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

kydo pfp

Two questions that's been on my mind, would love people's thoughts here. 1. Does the moneiness of a derivative of ETH (eg LST) translates into the moneiness of ETH? 2. Does the moneiness of ETH translates into the moneiness of a derivative of ETH (eg LST)?

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Barnabé Monnot pfp

Barnabé Monnot

Please expand ser. What is one example of the moneiness (moneyness?) of a derivative influencing the moneyness of ETH? What do you define as moneyness?

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Ronan pfp

would argue that an LST with sufficient liquidity and integrations (stETH) eliminates the opportunity cost of staking (locking) your ETH, thus increasing ETHs underlying utility (especially as a collateral money), which proliferates the use of ETH as money -- moneyness 🆙

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Barnabé Monnot pfp

Barnabé Monnot

If we wanted to eliminate the opportunity cost of staking and have more ETH around to use as collateral, why wouldn't we prefer to target some amount at stake?

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Ronan pfp

i guess i agree that some target amount at stake is ok, just dont really know how you come up with that desired % ? Dont think there is anything inherently wrong with targeting, but deciding too quickly or targeting too low of a % seemingly will have negative externalities

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Barnabé Monnot pfp

Barnabé Monnot

To be clear the decision right now (and even then, not right now, in the months to come) is not about targeting, but about a more moderate issuance curve https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/electra-issuance-curve-adjustment-proposal/18825?u=barnabe

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Ronan pfp

yea i think my main concerns are: -vertically integrated centralized providers could push the long-tail of stakers and protocols out: prob of CB having >50% of stake increases imo -frequent adjustment of the issuance curve arguably degrades ETHs moneyness -issuance doesnt necessarily have to be dilutive for holders

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Barnabé Monnot pfp

Barnabé Monnot

- Well incidentally I was replying to CB > 50% stake in a different forum, but here are some thoughts on this narrative: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/electra-issuance-curve-adjustment-proposal/18825/11?u=barnabe

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Barnabé Monnot pfp

Barnabé Monnot

- Agreed on changing the curve too frequently, the spirit of these proposals is indeed to take us to a point where the curve can weather any condition and it never needs to be tweaked ever again. Feels bad to mess around but it's a cost that may be worth it now, definitely increases with time though

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

adcv pfp

a thriving application market on top of the current issuance curve design is a success and proof it sort of works actually rushing into the first of what is guaranteed to be an endless line of One Last Changes trades the dream of automation for forever manual governance to rein in the most successful application?

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction