Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Adam pfp
Adam
@adamtj-xyz
1 / 2 A few questions 1) how are tick spaces determined when deploying a pool? Is there a sort of common number thats just fine for most cases? 2) i understand that the price shifts whenever y / x moves in the tick range. But different pools across all of defi have different ratios. How do
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Adam pfp
Adam
@adamtj-xyz
prices remain consistent across different AMMs? Do they just rely on arbitragers to exploit the discrepancy until its fixed?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Haardik pfp
Haardik
@haardikkk
arbitrage, yep - this is what a lot of MEV bots do - arbitrage, lending/borrowing liquidations, etc
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Adam pfp
Adam
@adamtj-xyz
and then whats the time frame of that all of this can happen? sometimes its hard for me to imagine just how fast the bots are exploiting discrepancies. im assuming that the price wont stay inconsistent past even 1 block
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Haardik pfp
Haardik
@haardikkk
that's a reasonable assumption, yep. Arbitrage is a highly competitive field with a very long tail of competitors. usually arbitrage gets settled within the same block - thanks to MEV this is actually an example of non-toxic MEV (toxic MEV is things like sandwich attacks)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Adam pfp
Adam
@adamtj-xyz
i see. and then when we discuss how hooks can be created that prevent toxic mev, it would be us coming up with mechanism designs to mitigate that. are there any existing examples of this out there? I'd be curious to read more
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Adam pfp
Adam
@adamtj-xyz
I'm familiar with sushi doing some kind of mev protection at the protocol level https://snapshot.org/#/sushigov.eth/proposal/bafkreigjjhjx2j2b526d3poeg23w2xan4rcgnzvcxinsssv7n37lu5p7s4
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction