Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Adam pfp
Adam
@adamhurwitz
With the recent changes to @warpcast channels and discussion around moving towards decentralization and the @farcaster protocol layer, I asked a top builder at a @devcon side event how they'd structure channels. They said they'd connect channels to @ensdomains rather than attempting to reinvent namespaces and ownership. Makes sense to me.
2 replies
3 recasts
26 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I think adding ENS as an option is nice. But most good names are taken. Which would reduce new channel creation.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

William Saar pfp
William Saar
@saarw.eth
Curious how you see the future of ENS as part of FC now that it's building its own L2 Eth, Optimism, Namechain... are things getting too fragmented?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Adam pfp
Adam
@adamhurwitz
I think of these as different backend service tools. If you look at any TradTech social app there are API calls being made to many services for different features.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

William Saar pfp
William Saar
@saarw.eth
Yes, I can see that Farcaster would want to support many kinds of providers. Seems users having to bridge or buy currency on different chains will introduce friction though
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction