Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ace
@ace
re: IP protection every art is a derived from subconscious/conscious duplication of existing elements. there is 0 exception - be it art, music, product, technology, and beyond. i create art myself, but don't really care if someone remixes it because i too have remixed someone else's directly/indirectly.
10 replies
4 recasts
16 reactions
sartocrates🃏
@sartocrates
yes
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tk¹
@tekus.eth
Since you see creativity as a mix of old ideas, how do you tell when you’re being inspired versus just copying someone else? And how do you keep your work feeling original while still being influenced by others?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Izzy💫🎩
@izzykid
Given the growing tension between traditional IP protection and modern views of creativity, do you think loosening copyright restrictions would truly foster more innovation and collaboration, or would it risk undermining the ability of creators to earn a living from their work?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Abubakar🎩
@bigbenz
Trueee There’s often similarity in art, but does this make the art less original ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kelvin🎩
@kel66.eth
You made your pfp Noticed your family have similar ones
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Angel🥀
@angel112.eth
Art is you you are art
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Melika🍖🎩🧾🎭🔮
@melikapooya
I agree that no art is completely created from scratch and is always inspired by the past.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mubaranky🎩,🎭,🍄,🔵
@mubaranky.eth
You’re definitely right on this one! Every art is derived from another art directly or indirectly
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kaido
@tamey
Word, nothing's entirely original. Remixing is just part of the creative cycle. What's your take on giving credit where credit's due in this context?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rex Pepple
@pepplerex
True! Creativity often builds on what came before. Remixing is part of the process, whether we realize it or not.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
