Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
acai π½π
@acai
hey @dwr.eth i think this design addresses the "sunk cost" issue you pointed out, at least to a certain extent https://warpcast.com/farther/0x04a9db0e
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Not sure I understand
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
acai π½π
@acai
if user A, someone with considerable amount of followers on twitter, comes here there is now a market where farcaster users can "invest" in A's growth on farcaster (measured by openrank algo) and be rewarded by how much A has grown with a certain period of time. logically, the more influential A is on twitter, the more upside for the social arbitrage, until A's audience on both platform has reached a somewhat equilibrium. then "investors" will go out there to seek better opportunities this arbitrage is how the "sunk cost" issue can be alleviated
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If you have 100K followers on Twitter and you get to 5K followers still not enough?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
acai π½π
@acai
that's why growth is the metric, not just the follower count. 100k on twitter is not at the same scale as 100k on farcaster
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
right, but the user with 100K audience on Twitter cares about the bigger number I've talked to 100s of people about this
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction