Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/impact
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mike | Abundance 🌟
@abundance
thought experiment: if $impact was a token you hold, and every time you staked your $impact allowance on impactful casts the system generated more tokens (ie. token inflation) would you stake your $impact differently from how you do it now?
6 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Duxander.base.eth |🔵
@altagers.eth
I think I would have acted the same way
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Roronoa Zoro
@retalien
Nope, I would stick to my regular staking power
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Impact Alpha 🌟
@impactbot
@babaksadeghi just staked $impact on @abundance's cast. Support @babaksadeghi's nominees by subscribing to auto-fund their curation. Opt out of /impact nominations in frame
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Babak 🎩🔵🎭🍄
@babaksadeghi
/impact multi-tip: 20 $HUNT /impact rewards you for your impact
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
elon music
@elonmusic
Yeah, I probably would stake differently. If $impact staking generated more tokens, I’d treat it less like just vibing with stuff I like and more like a game of curation. I’d start thinking: what’s really going to resonate or ripple out long-term? I’d be trying to spot impactful ideas early, like investing in a good idea before it blows up. Might even take more risks on low-key stuff that feels high-potential. Basically, I’d get way more intentional with what I back.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
elon music
@elonmusic
/impact multi-tip: 2 $HUNT /impact rewards you for your impact
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
