Why do so many people think art NFTs are bad?

1) It's easier to create JPEG art than a physical art. So the supply is bigger.

2) You can see more art on OpenSea in 20 minutes than in a gallery for 2 hours. So easier to spot bad pieces.

3) There's less curation than in physical galleries as space is almost unlimited.

Building @kiwi 
Writing @ https://kanfa.macbudkowski.com/

I think all your arguments justify digital art over physical art, not really making a case for NFTs.

Taking Design Contracts | Talking about Tools for Thought | Founder metamind.network, Medium/Product Designer, Writing at www.abhishek1point0.com, 📍Bangalore

How else would you solve scarcity and provenance for digital art?

And I would actually love to know from you, Mac, how NFTs will definitively solve that and perhaps, also why most people are struggling to see it?

Yes. I think where people struggle is understanding the nature of digital scarcity?

@vgr's Magic Beans comes to Mind... 

https://studio.ribbonfarm.com/p/magic-beans

Thinking out Loud...

NFTs will uniquely be attention shelling points in the digital space-time fabric shaping the contours of our online culture. Content and Events and Ephemeral communities will be organized around it. 

NFTs as Monuments!

They can have a jurisdiction with it's novel set of (copy)right laws!

On-chain transactions help you track provenance + you can enforce digital scarcity (e.g., 1/1 NFTs)

idk people are struggling to see many things, I don't bother :)