Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
phil
@phil
I've been thinking a lot about the community's allergic reaction to last week's AMA. Clearly, there was a culture clash. Robin came in with a negative tone and voiced complaints, which people don't like (hello mood affiliation). He also didn't genuflect to crypto to try and make us like him, although it would have been easy to do that. And many people's responses were: ok boomer, go somewhere else. But what if Robin just happens to be the only one to say what others are thinking? He is active on Twitter and has been blogging for nearly two decades, so it wasn't purely a technology issue. What can we learn?
14 replies
12 recasts
104 reactions
a1z2 💫
@a1z2
I thought it was the most entertaining and healthy book AMA so far. Constructive feedback is good. Matter of fact responses are also fine. It did bring up questions like what kind of expectation setting do you do for non-crypto people? And should you seek out authors who have a genuine interest in the platform and connecting with this audience? He seems sufficiently online so I don’t think he’s unaware of dunking… Was the whole thing a missed opportunity? Maybe. Did it provide the platform with engaging content? Yes.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
