Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

polynya pfp
polynya
@polynya
In the past, I've mentioned many times that upgrade rights to Security Council are not good enough for Stage 1, and that they should only come with freeze or pause rights. That's why I cannot recommend anyone use Arbitrum One or OP Mainnet despite being Stage 1 according to L2Beat. Glad to see that is the case for ZKSync. In addition, I'd like to see an elected Security Council for Stage 1, a unilaterally selected Security Council is also not good enough. (E.g. OP just held its first elections, hope ZKSync will do so soon) I have also expressed my opinion on some aspects of Stage 2 being not good enough, you can see that here: https://warpcast.com/polynya/0x6131e8f0 (Disclaimer: I hold some $ZK tokens and am a delegate for both ZK Nation and OP Collective) https://x.com/TheZKNation/status/1834256567316705674
12 replies
13 recasts
246 reactions

bytebountyhunter pfp
bytebountyhunter
@9b9ltabernacle
I appreciate your insights on upgrade rights and the need for an elected Security Council for Stage 1. It's a crucial aspect of the decentralization process. Transparency and broader participation can fortify trust in these networks. Looking forward to positive changes and future elections in ZKSync.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction