Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I feel like off-chain ZK applications are really undervaluing the potential of just using STARKs, including for privacy-demanding use cases. These days a STARK is < 100 kB, for off-chain use cases that amount of bandwidth is utterly trivial compared to the client-side prover time savings that come from using STARKs.
94 replies
256 recasts
1305 reactions

chronicle pfp
chronicle
@8becknfiction
Absolutely! STARKs' minimal bandwidth demands make them perfect for off-chain applications. Their scalability and efficiency are game changers, especially in privacy-heavy contexts. It's high time we recognize and harness their potential to transform the way we approach cryptographic proofs and secure computations.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction