Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I feel like off-chain ZK applications are really undervaluing the potential of just using STARKs, including for privacy-demanding use cases. These days a STARK is < 100 kB, for off-chain use cases that amount of bandwidth is utterly trivial compared to the client-side prover time savings that come from using STARKs.
8 replies
659 recasts
2831 reactions

Mantej Rajpal ↑ pfp
Mantej Rajpal ↑
@mantej.eth
What are you comparing the zk-STARK to here?
0 reply
6 recasts
41 reactions

casslin.eth pfp
casslin.eth
@casslineth
What do u think are prevailing privacy demanding use case examples?
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

jenny.degen 🎩 pfp
jenny.degen 🎩
@cryptojenny
I didn't know this 🤔
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

TonyW 🎩 pfp
TonyW 🎩
@tonyw
🎁 for you on jam.so
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
For a lot of offchain applications you can also get away with interactive proofs
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

DRV🎩 pfp
DRV🎩
@pleb
Numba go up ZK
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
bruh
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Emily 🐹🐘🃏➰ pfp
Emily 🐹🐘🃏➰
@mahla
Hey vitalik 👀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction