Content
@
0 reply
17 recasts
17 reactions
basil
@itsbasil
>blockchains only make sense for maybe 10% of games >no one cares or needs to know you’re building on one >introducing tokens will result in dead on arrival 99% of the time >if your onchain for cosmetics only, you shouldn’t be onchain at all >autonomous worlds & fully onchain games aren’t anywhere close
9 replies
1 recast
13 reactions
GWYNBLEIDD
@1xgwynbleidd
and what's the problem with cosmetics? I realize that making blockchain more complicated is not the answer, but the economies of the games in Steam are doing quite well with it
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
basil
@itsbasil
no problem, just unnecessary for most games. see things like fortnite or something closer like csgo. why would these games go through the process of deploying a chain? they make plenty of money without them & the introduction of them will likely only do more harm than good due to friction and/or perception problems. if you go through the hassle of adding a chain, it’s probably only worth it if you intend to use it in novel ways like perpetual royalties or identity 4000 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
