1dolinski on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

balajis pfp

$1000 Prize for AI Conference Organizer When you’re collecting slides from many people for a conference, you need to *validate* those slides. 1) The first check is format. Is this PDF, Google Slides, Keynote, Figma, Canva? Is it a file or a URL? 2) The second check is deterministic. What is the size of each deck, the number of slides, the fonts used? Is video present, and if so is there audio? 3) The third check is probabilistic. Does the deck fit the conference format? For example, does it have a title slide? Is it all bullet points (which we don’t want) or does it have images? Each of these kinds of checks can be expressed as AI prompts. What I want: an open source AI-based slide validator, with all the code at replit.com, which sets up a form that implements these three checks. The workflow is: first paste in URL or upload file. Then determine format and run deterministic checks. Finally, run each AI check as an individual prompt. The result is a list of ❌and ✅ for every unit test. @bountybot

13 replies

138 recasts

514 reactions

1dolinski pfp

These bounties are great. I also can use this tool. One adverse effect, particularly with @balajis.eth, @vitalik.eth @bryanjohnson's notoriety is that several developers can end up working on the same task. If people do it for fun, by all means. However, since there is a payment motive, there is a race. There should be a way for a developer to indicate they are working on it. By doing so: - valuable developer time is not spent on the same task - developers can pair up with each other Additionally, there is the natural better, faster, cheaper trifecta. This can be made in a day, the polish could take a few days. Perhaps given a 1 month timeframe he fastest should get paid out and the best should get paid out. cc @linda

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Linda Xie pfp

Bounties above $500 are always prompted if there is an application/assignment process so there isn't duplicate work but in this case it sounds like the intention is a race Devs can indicate they are working on it in the bounty thread (we guide users to do that in our FAQ if there is a race) https://warpcast.com/bountybot/0x857fbd47

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

1dolinski pfp

Hey Linda, those are great guidelines. In the spirit of being a founder/builder myself Personally, I'd like the UI to highlight - how many devs have started on this task, without having to read through 32 comment (already), 90%+ not related to working on the bounty and 132 likes could mean that far more than 2 people are working on it - convenience link or rating to see how good are those devs / their past completion rate - perhaps bountycaster or the bounty creator could allocate a bonus for using the system of "opting into the bounty" There is so much opportunity here

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Linda Xie pfp

- we're not actually able to create clean data on how many devs have started the task since there's a lot of spam in both Farcaster replies and frame clicks (e.g. if we were to have a button that allows people to click and say they are working on this) so we don't want to be misleading and act as a source of truth for this - we do have Bountycaster profiles for each dev that replied. If you go to the bounty page you can see Bountycaster completion history and any shoutouts the user received https://www.bountycaster.xyz/bounty/0x392626b092e05955c11c41c5df8e2fb8003ece78 - not sure I understand the bonus part of opting into the bounty but for context we're a bootstrapped 2 person team so we don't have funds to be providing bonuses on our end + focused on features that move the needle on the product

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction