Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

polynya pfp
polynya
@polynya
I quit a large audience on Twitter and joined Farcaster a year ago as a direct replacement. I didn't know Varun or Dan, and indeed, anyone else active on Farcaster at the time. While "the list" made sense early on, it should be opt-in recommendations now - the engagement inequality is very real. This is made worse by the hyperfinancialization, where a handful of those people are incentivized to be very active, while a vast majority of the rest are bots. (IMO, as a casual observer nowadays) Farcaster right now should be aggressively focused on social values over financial values (and yes, this is a very direct contradiction and trade-off) - in design, engineering, and most importantly marketing. Unless the terminal addressable market target is degens, which is fair enough.
20 replies
35 recasts
240 reactions

1𝐴35𝐸1 pfp
1𝐴35𝐸1
@1a35e1
Not sure how "the list" is generated, but the general onboarding style that seems to be well adopted is suggestions based on interests. There should be sufficient data now to develop a graph of users who are "good" subject matter experts across popular domains.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

1𝐴35𝐸1 pfp
1𝐴35𝐸1
@1a35e1
We spent two years at my last company thinking about this problem, that ended up in a research project with the Turning institute. Would recommend having a quick read, it's not too dense. https://www.turing.ac.uk/news/publications/data-study-group-final-report-entale
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction