blingblingđ
@16
Which is easier to maintain, cheaper, and more stable: deploying a continuously running service on a self-hosted server or launching an on-demand service in the cloud?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
blobs
@blobs
cloud
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
blingblingđ
@16
What kind of services do you usually deploy on the cloud? Serverless or continuously running services?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
blobs
@blobs
all continuously running services; i donât like serverless b/c i canât set up local dev environment we do use hasura cloud which manages our graphQL API between clients and DB everything else we deploy via AWS ECS
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
vincent
@pixel
what do you mean can't setup local dev environment, if you have /api routes on nextjs, you can just call it on localhost:3000/api, no?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
blobs
@blobs
okay yes. but we donât use next.js/vercel for backend đ i was thinking using AWS lambdas ⌠and itâs really confusing to get local env set up
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
blobs
@blobs
i like stuffing everything in containers so my services are portable across any cloud platform! serverless handlers arenât portable âšď¸âŚ handler you write on vercel wonât work on AWS âŚ
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
blingblingđ
@16
That's true. That is another reason why I'm concerned about serverless. I don't want to be tied to a specific cloud.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction