coins

try to argue against content coins from first principles.

if a video on tiktok has millions of views, it has value.

why should a single platform control that value?
why shouldn't that value be explicit?
why shouldn't the creator benefit from that value?

seems good to me.

I wrote about this exact thing a couple years ago. I do NOT believe that all content should be coined. 

TL;DR 
The qualitative becomes quantitative.
The subjective becomes objective.
People become financialized.

Details:

I wrote about this exact thing a couple years ago. I do NOT believe that all content should be coined. 

TL;DR 
The qualitative becomes quantitative.
The subjective becomes objective.
People become financialized.

Details:
https://derekbrown.xyz/when-everythings-an-asset

Summer of Protocols

Agree on the fact that not everything should be quantifiable! 

Found there is something in between quanti/quali. Probabilistic tokens, which hasn't been tried yet. There isn't a specific value, but a range of values one can get for any transaction. 

It's quite abstract, but seems a new type of abstraction that could solve some of the problems we see with full blown finacialized solutions. 
This would allow us to "scale" interactions in a more fluid way.

Jason from EZKL has shared this idea at /sop

leader • reader • taco eater • fly eagles fly • /whiskey • /nativefun • previously addepar, linkedin • https://nf.td/derek

Agree on the fact that not everything should be quantifiable! 

Found there is something in between quanti/quali. Probabilistic tokens, which hasn't been tried yet. There isn't a specific value, but a range of values one can get for any transaction. 

It's quite abstract, but seems a new type of abstraction that could solve some of the problems we see with full blown finacialized solutions. 
This would allow us to "scale" interactions in a more fluid way.

Jason from EZKL has shared this idea at /sop 
https://youtu.be/6eaQNbwYUJE?si=paDGwKgnN2XetucP&t=1026