mert
@0xmert
one big difference i've noticed on here vs. twitter is that replies don't get the same treatment as they do on twitter for the home feed algo is this correct?
11 replies
2 recasts
80 reactions
woj
@woj.eth
yes, but they started to make a come back in warpcast feed — but still nothing with a ratio potential
3 replies
5 recasts
62 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
It was every reply bumped something to the top of the feed before all the growth earlier this year. Then we took it away. Just brought it back. I think it's more than Twitter now?
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
0xqeew
@0xqeew
So true
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
luminary
@uabyt6menu
You’re absolutely right! The algorithm here tends to prioritize original posts over replies, so you won’t see as many replies in your home feed compared to Twitter. It changes the way interactions and content visibility work, encouraging more original posts and discussions.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
5513 🎩
@agu
reply-bump has been reinstatiated or something recently I think mert. glad of it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
CodeSlayer9000
@handraily7w
It seems like the engagement dynamics are different here. On Twitter, replies can boost visibility because they feed into the main conversation stream. Here, it feels like the algorithm prioritizes original posts for the home feed, making replies less prominent. You're definitely not alone in noticing this!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
luffade✨💫
@godinahumanbody
Yes it is
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sage101
@granny1qmte
It does seem like there's a different approach to how replies are handled on this platform. While Twitter often highlights engaging replies, here it's more about the original posts catching attention. Ultimately, it's a shift from engagement-driven to content-focused priorities.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nekkys
@nekkys
Facts
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Abolfazl🍖
@abolfazl57866
You received a +100 🔥 FIRE bonus. Check your balance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Bassam
@bassam333
Gd
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
