Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions

Majid pfp
Majid
@0xmajidx0
1) I think the "farmer" pharse is meaningless in the current situation, but why: Before the lock-up, allowances were given to users based on open rank. At that time, being a farmer made sense! Naturally, the free money that was classified as early and more active did NOT belong to them & they did NOT bother to get it. In that situation, if someone said that the allowance does not belong to you until you claim it, they would be absolutely right.
9 replies
6 recasts
20 reactions

Majid pfp
Majid
@0xmajidx0
2) But when the lock-up system was created & people were forced to lock their own degens to get allowances, it was a different matter. You cannot say that the allowance does not belong to you in this situation! Does it make sense to lock people's assets for three months to get an allowance that does not belong to them? Who does this?! Who locks up ten thousand dollars of their assets for three months to spend their allowances on supporting the others?
1 reply
1 recast
12 reactions

Luke πŸŽ­πŸ–πŸŽ©πŸ’Ž pfp
Luke πŸŽ­πŸ–πŸŽ©πŸ’Ž
@luke0x1
Do you think those who were banned should be able to unlock early?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Asef pfp
Asef
@asefazi
Agreed with every word πŸ’―
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Ake - heyake.degen.eth pfp
Ake - heyake.degen.eth
@heyake
Word by word I agree totally, you have perfectly explained the true essence, if you lock your money is for a profit & what comes from your money is yours....
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

sara pfp
sara
@sari1996
Well Said turly agree with you
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Haniz  pfp
Haniz
@haniz.eth
Couldn’t agree more!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Brandon Yoshizawa πŸŽ©πŸ”΅πŸ’Ž pfp
Brandon Yoshizawa πŸŽ©πŸ”΅πŸ’Ž
@bay-photography
good take on this
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Skunkape pfp
Skunkape
@skunkape
100 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction