social

DAOs 2.0

https://jessewalden.com/daos-2-0/

DAOs 2.0 aim to achieve true autonomy through onchain agents, echoing Dreamcoin's hypernetworks concept of agent-driven organizational architecture.

this article noted that earlier DAOs were human-centric with minimal automation. Onchain agents signify the start of DAOs 2.0, enabling AI to automate daily objectives while humans focus on providing capital, guidance, and long-term planning, tasks beyond AI's reach.

This approach is particularly suited for tasks like long-term investing, which involve uncertain factors and complex data. Agents can efficiently execute immediate strategies using deterministic algorithms and accessible data.

The rise of agents in DAOs is a clear trend, and look forward to projects that successfully implement and scale this concept.

crypto-anarchist · onchain social explorer, advisor · spread FC gospel in /chinese community · curate SocialSight.telegram· write 0xluo.xyz · host /luo ·中文 @luo

questioning whether a dao 2.0 is simply referring to baseline capabilities of AGI

I think DAOs 2.0 is a model, while AGI is a description of AI capabilities. Within DAOs, different levels of AI can be utilized, thereby achieving varying degrees of autonomy.

prev founded rocketr.net, swish.id now exploring aiXcrypto identity ai. expired sprint car driver & energy data engineer. idol worship on shoni_eth.X

I kind of understand what you mean, and I think it will require more practice to fully understand the capabilities of AI within a DAO and whether it is truly effective.

and yes, it takes Level 5 AI capabilities to truly achieve a DAO.

hmm see my concern is that any agi would be capable some are just more effective potentially but i guess we don't really know what agi or live training look like

on reflection it seems like Level 5 = true DAO