Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
https://www.theblock.co/post/331713/german-authority-orders-eyeball-scanning-world-project-to-delete-data-after-investigation This article misses an important distinction by the Bavarian DPA in their decision. They made a key point twice which should send chills down the spine of any company posting raw data about users onchain: “Comprehensive erasure following withdrawal of consent” And “the unrestricted opportunity to enforce their right to erasure” This isn’t accidental, and tho IANAL, I read it as there being no way to be GDPR compliant when posting user data onchain, no matter what consent you receive. Maybe they will clarify this guidance later but I would recommend any companies doing onchain attestations or the like to investigate partial blind models so that the onchain component doesn’t inherently contain user data
2 replies
1 recast
9 reactions
Steve
@0xlp
Gn dear farcaster member
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec @0xlp bot
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Steve
@0xlp
What? why? only because I said gm you consider me as a bot? ok I won't comment on your posts ever again! Jesus |:
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
