Clankers

I often browse around on Clanker.
There are so many junk tokens that have no real value or clear project behind them.

I think they’re ruining the essence and core value of what a token should be.
Are they creating tokens based on actual work?
Or are they just trying to trap buyers?

Is there no filter on Clanker to ensure that only those who are truly creating tokens for real projects get access?

Honestly, I see more junk tokens than valuable ones. I think Clanker is being misused.

I suggest a feature to help distinguish tokens with real value and clear projects from spam tokens.
There could be a “verified” label — not meaning the token was created by the Clanker team, but as a sign that it has a purpose and can be traced (while still encouraging DYOR).

These types of tokens could be placed in a dedicated section.
The verification label could be granted if the token creator has a mini app or other relevant use case,
with a submission process that is then validated by a dedicated team.

This is just a rough idea of mine — I’m not sure if it would have any impact or could even be implemented in Clanker.
However, I think it could encourage more buyers to engage in real transactions (not just sniping) if this feature existed.

indexing and “champagne clankers” is something we’re actively ideating around! 

what’s one feature you’d add or change? 

ty for feedback!