Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
two things can be true: 1. this is good revenue generation for these pods that wouldnā€™t have been generated on traditional platforms 2. as a podcaster, ā€œminutes listenedā€ is infinitely more valuable to me compared to ā€œmints,ā€ which imo is the most unreliable onchain metric for quality of multimedia content
19 replies
7 recasts
251 reactions

Lucas šŸ”„_šŸ”„ pfp
Lucas šŸ”„_šŸ”„
@0xl
Agreed on this! Getting people to actually consume the content is the goal. We track basic listening data internally and you might be surprised (we were) on the correlation in mint traffic to listening If you can get people to mint, you can sure as hell get them to listen :)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
1) why were you surprised? 2) correlation even when you remove the confounding factor of podcast/er's distribution? 3) ofc that's not a surprise, but the mint then is actually an "ad" that indicates interest and the "minutes listened" would be the point of sale/conversion; we shouldn't confuse the two imo
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
can you please share this data publicly?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction