Study ship it and talk to customers…and repeat for 10 years

Survivorship bias here. How many dozens of exchanges or defi protocols hastily shipped and got users absolutely rekt.

'If you're not embarrassed by the first version of your product, you've launched too late' ethos run amok resulting in things like Humane, Rabbit, Friendtech and others. Like @keccers.eth said on X, is why things like Daylight seem remarkable. Web3 particularly guilty, clunks get but on back-burner, jankiness persists

I understand @barmstrong’s sentiment and agree that shipping paralysis is a real thing but as discussed here I think the pendulum has swung too far in recent years:

icebreaker.xyz/0xen |
https://gallery.so/Oxen/galleries | https://opensea.io/collection/farcats

and of course this should never be applied to security - maybe goes without saying but important caveat

I understand @barmstrong’s sentiment and agree that shipping paralysis is a real thing but as discussed here I think the pendulum has swung too far in recent years:

https://warpcast.com/0xen/0xbe568dfb

i don't know but the context here is crypto and as a user you can feel the consequences of this mantra. so much in this space feels rushed and held together with duct tape, and so so much money has vanished in to thin air due to imprudence and haste.

What large successful companies in the last 20 years have been slow and deliberate vs. ship and iterate?

Granted you +100 🔥 FIRE. Balance verification needed.

Doesn't it depend on the domain and scope of your product ? 

Ex, a smart contract storing fund/ liquidity, hastly shipped could lead to disaster 

While nonfinancial apps like warpcast, there is always a next release to fix things up

Valid point. It's easy to focus on the success stories and overlook the countless instances where rushed exchanges and defi protocols have led to significant losses for users. It's crucial to remember these cases when evaluating the true risk and impact of new financial technologies.