people, artists especially, don’t like the word ‘content’ at all so the whole thing already starts with a non zero level of ick from the name alone. maybe it doesn’t matter that much but I would drop the content thing from future copy

icebreaker.xyz/0xen |
https://gallery.so/Oxen/galleries | https://opensea.io/collection/farcats

maybe there’s not a better name that’s easy so it just has to be content coin, like I mentioned earlier somewhere that was the nice thing about ‘nft’ it abstracted away the term ‘token’ - just ‘coin’ is fine tho

Pi-chi.eth (she/her) Artist /animeoutcasts
Hosting: /sakura /kyoto /momiji  /anime-manga /farcasterunion

https://portrait.so/pichi

I think it’s fine that this meta isn’t for everybody, wish NFTs got a little more respect these days but that’s just how the market is

I don’t like this whole arc. I can’t be responsible for coins when I want to make art. I can play and test, but I don’t know how much I can lean into this meta.

I dunno, maybe it’s fine. I prefer NFTs partly because the name. Even though ‘token’ is in there it’s abstracted away

I agree with this, as soon as content is mentioned by a platform, I am subconsciously tuning out because I already feel that it’s not applying to the art market