rish

No one on Farcaster asking for fewer brown people in office

I imagine if people really believed it, they’d say it here too (especially given anon accounts)

Goes to show what’s engagement farming / political setup vs real belief systems 

There’s not enough engagement to farm here and Farcaster discussions don’t impact policy yet, and thus here we are

That said, Farcaster wins when it does impact policy

people here don’t say how they really feel about metamask for fear of reputational damage.

I agree that message wasn’t that bad tbh 

End outcomes re: reduced distribution are pretty similar

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1872464643266089067?s=46

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1872497302369382670?s=46

The good part about Farcaster is that one can build the Truth Social equivalent without losing all underlying data

Just a reminder that the algorithm is trying to maximize unregretted user-seconds. 

If far more credible, verified subscriber accounts (not bots) mute/block your account compared to those who like your posts, your reach will decline significantly.

Elon Musk

That said, any accounts found to be engaged in coordinated attacks to spam target accounts with mute/blocks will themselves be categorized – correctly – as spam. 

Live by the spam, die by the spam.

icebreaker.xyz/0xen |
https://gallery.so/Oxen/galleries | https://opensea.io/collection/farcats

working @ /neynar   🪐  casting @ /rish

the broader point is that is that people here don’t speak their minds on relatively small issues for fear of reputational damage so to expect them to speak up on actual controversial subjects is unreasonable