0xdusk

@0xdusk

147 Following

156 Followers

0xdusk pfp

We are building a public decentralized vector database which got all data from Farcaster Mirror and all kinds of web3 media data for AI agents. All data already available as a seach engine called index3.io , we are gonna launch an AI agent based on all these data, so it will have the entire memory of Farcaster.

2 replies

0 recast

11 reactions

0xdusk pfp

Does bidding income consider as income too? So does DAO have to pay 21% of total bidding income tax? And what about historical income?

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Ivo Entchev pfp

As a lawyer (and a crypto VC) who recently joined the DAO, I thought I would chime in on the DUNA proposal, especially as we are in the process of appointing an administrator. I realize the DAO has chosen a path here, and my goal is not to change it but rather educate members and create greater transparency.

3 replies

2 recasts

18 reactions

0xdusk pfp

Earned more than entire Nouns treasury with $trump today. 😂

11 replies

2 recasts

33 reactions

Ivo Entchev pfp

I was glad to help lead this effort by the crypto law bar to outline crypto policy priorities for the incoming administration. Regulatory policy governing crypto will be recast over the coming years. As an industry, we should do our best to communicate clearly and, as much as possible, unanimously. https://www.coindesk.com/opinion/2025/01/16/how-to-make-the-united-states-the-crypto-capital-of-the-world

0 reply

96 recasts

153 reactions

0xdusk pfp

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

Nadie ⌐◨-◨ (amigo 82) pfp

Nadie ⌐◨-◨ (amigo 82)

A nice kick-off for this week's Nouns Animators Round: Sports Edition! ⚽ /nouns vs /lilnouns—let the games begin! Frame-by-frame pixel art animation. I hope you enjoy it!

24 replies

27 recasts

75 reactions

LilPing pfp

Different paradigms of multi-agent systems emerge when considering voting in NounsDAO. The LessWrong article suggests decomposing the voting process into functional steps (info gathering, analysis, situational awareness, and final voting), each handled by specialized agents. In contrast, the GoverNoun approach proposes multiple self-contained agents, each completing the entire voting process independently while representing different stakeholder interests and engaging in political gameplay. I'm curious which approach would better suit NounsDAO-based agents, or if a hybrid model might work best. Looking forward to exploring this further. The first focuses on system efficiency through functional decomposition, while the second emphasizes political dynamics through agent interaction. Both offer interesting perspectives for DAO governance design. https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jpGHShgevmmTqXHy5/decomposing-agency-capabilities-without-desires

0 reply

1 recast

4 reactions

0xdusk pfp

We will see how it goes together!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0xdusk pfp

Indeed I’m still a newcomer. Just get started to knowing people here 😄

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

0xdusk pfp

We are also providing a public infra for everyone in the DAO to launch their own agents, so we could definitely try your idea too! Thank you so much for the feedback and looking forward to working with you more!

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Alex Murray pfp

Excited to engage with the Nouns community on this project!

0 reply

2 recasts

5 reactions

Ivo Entchev pfp

Excited to engage with the Nouns community on a potential experiment with a governance AI agent. Nouns has a great community and is the perfect context for something like this. Let’s rekindle the creative flame within Nouns, and let’s do it together.

0 reply

2 recasts

5 reactions

0xdusk pfp

Lol, it feels abrupt to submit a proposal like this as an new comer.

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

0xdusk pfp

This is a piece by @alexmurray, @ivolver, and me. We are implementing a governance AI agent for Nouns. The agent will be purely transparent. All prompts and RAG data will be publicly available on IPFS and linked with an ENS domain name. Actually, the agent itself lives on ENS and IPFS; anyone can explore its components. The entire decision-making process of the AI agent will be verifiable on-chain. We will delegate all of our Nouns to the AI agent to observe how it acts and how the community engages with it. Hopefully, this experiment can be a great success and result in an excellent paper. The reason why I am bidding on all these Nouns is that I want the agent to have some kind of “swing state” power in these experiments. This way, people will want to engage with it and try to win its votes. We are newcomers to the community and have a lot to learn about the DAO. Any feedback would be appreciated! Many thanks! https://substack.com/inbox/post/153783194

9 replies

0 recast

27 reactions

0xdusk pfp

Lol, so my question is how did the prop get passed? They must be friends with everyone in the DAO to get the prop passed like 99:3

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

0xdusk pfp

Did an OTC trade with @abcd for Noun 34/315/813 . Not easy to get a low ID lol.

3 replies

1 recast

16 reactions

seneca pfp

@0xdusk with the sweep 🏌️‍♂️

6 replies

1 recast

21 reactions

0xdusk pfp

Inviting @ivolver , one of our best investor and a U.S. lawyer. He is Noun 1077 and always talk about DAOs with me.

4 replies

0 recast

12 reactions

0xdusk pfp

We will post more details soon! Stay tuned!

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions