Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
this is what i mean by crypto feels like a bunch of scattered gift cards and debit cards. right now money is fragmented across many "loaded" wallets. but it should be money from a single source pulled by many empty wallets. does this make any sense???
21 replies
13 recasts
111 reactions
Tmophoto 🟡🎩 pfp
Tmophoto 🟡🎩
@tmophoto
there is probably tens of thousands of eth locked in wallets as dust that will never move again.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
links pfp
links
@links
It gets worse when every app wants you to load funds onto their ecosystem so they have a sink for their token.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Tomu pfp
Tomu
@tomu
a step closer https://warpcast.com/henri/0xcfde3911
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
max ↑🎩 pfp
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
Makes total sense, 95%+ of my wallet value is spread across dozens smart wallets, staking etc. Last week I casted about linking wallets, here as a source of funds you're meaning your primary wallet right So all others are secondary and I think you should be able to pull money from them without going to each app
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Steve pfp
Steve
@sdv.eth
Illustrations make sense! Maybe add bidirectional arrows to the fragmented money circles to illustrate how messy it is moving funds across those as well?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yuusuf 🎩⚡🍖 pfp
Yuusuf 🎩⚡🍖
@oladipoyuusuf
Smells like chain abstraction 🤔
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gittu.eth pfp
gittu.eth
@gittu
Sure, I get you. Crypto is still in its early stages, and there's a lot of fragmentation. But I believe that over time, we'll see more consolidation and interoperability.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ivan 🎭 pfp
Ivan 🎭
@soquger
Awarded you +100 🔥 FIRE. Promptly check your balance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stéphane Zermatten pfp
Stéphane Zermatten
@crypticzed.eth
and embedded wallets, as great as they are for adoption, will not make things better... 5 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nuconomy ⌐◨-◨ 🎩 pfp
nuconomy ⌐◨-◨ 🎩
@nuconomy.eth
It doesn’t seem to be going that way. If there were a middle layer aggregating the disparate sources and then pushing out for payments it might make that side of things simpler. ETH is pulled from three chains into a single spend transaction, rather than bridge, bridge, bridge, spend.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mykola Voloshyn pfp
Mykola Voloshyn
@alokym92
That's partially why I think this cycle is completely different from the last
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jarry 🐲 pfp
Jarry 🐲
@jarry
I want more seamless chains - eth fragmented all over >_>
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Absolute Unit pfp
Absolute Unit
@absolute-unit
yup unified liquidity layers fix this, hence the focus on chain abstraction and SC wallets
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zakhap.eth pfp
zakhap.eth
@zakhap
I feel like this is at the core of the money design problem: is it a push money or a pull money? utxos in Bitcoin are push monies while the account and AA systems can be either.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mash pfp
Mash
@marsh0
Makes total sense! Crypto should feel like a seamless, unified experience, not a jumble of cards.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sad pfp
Sad
@sad0
Makes perfect sense. Crypto should be more unified.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sam pfp
Sam
@sam0
🤔 I get what you're saying. It's like having a bunch of separate gift cards instead of one universal currency. Should we keep the conversation going?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mash pfp
Mash
@mash0
I get it, it can feel like that sometimes!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harry Forrox pfp
Harry Forrox
@dddinamarca
wow
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction