Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
rocketman
@rocketman
cost to scam > /flows earnings it should be a no-brainer to participate honestly in /flows, because you can earn substantially more just doing a good job capitalism/markets already work this way. how do we bring that same meritocratic upside to public goods?
5 replies
4 recasts
18 reactions
rocketman
@rocketman
current thinking is we use AI models to grade/verify impact. i think this is good to weed out underperformers + spot obvious slackers but grant farmers will just use their own AI to stay ahead of the curve feels too much like we're trying to over-police things / catch fraud. that's important, but don't think it's a final solution and doesn't feel very positive sum to me
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
rocketman
@rocketman
imo markets might lead us to a better answer it should work like this: 1. apply for funding doing something you already love + have proven track record working on 2. AI helps synthesize your impact, give tips how to improve, catch people who stop building 3. instead of trying to constantly play a game of cat and mouse w/fraud systems, make /flows the biggest upside thing you're personally working on how? not exactly sure yet
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
rocketman
@rocketman
any ideas? @seneca @noun40 @spencerperkins.eth @coleperkins @pedropregueiro @0xdariush @skateboard @jackwyldes.eth @krel @wiz @4156 @toadyhawk.eth @curtiscoffee.eth
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
0xDariush | MAYC 6900
@0xdariush
Over the years, we've seen some cash grabs in our funding system. Our current fund is smaller than many of those, yet we've achieved more in short time! Plus, the ability to stop salaries if goals aren't met minimizes risks. Had we used this system before, we could've saved a significant amount of ETH from the treasury
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
