Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Update on channels 1. It's not a top priority right now 2. Channels are not expiring; if we end up moving forward with an expiration, we will give advanced notice; consider it an indefinite grace period 3. When it becomes a priority, we will resolve abandoned and squatted channels as part of the expiration; we will likely decentralize channel creation at that point — however, only when a top priority 4. What's higher priority than channels? a. Continue to improve frames UX, especially with regard to onchain interactions b. Improve discovery across Farcaster for anyone building / creating something onchain c. Snapchain — need to scale the underlying protocol d. Cheaper sign ups — top request from several existing apps with large user bases considering integrating with Farcaster e. Migrating Sign in with Farcaster to Farcaster Connect (see FIP) to allow other clients to provide auth for apps / frames f. Rewards and onboarding improvements around invites
22 replies
28 recasts
199 reactions
0xChris
@0xchris
OK update but I wish you could share more details as to why. For example, why is channels de-prioritize. Is it because roadmap is done or because there’s no product-market fit? Why emphasis on discovery? What are the KPI’s you’re trying to hit. Etc.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0xf384e355
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0xChris
@0xchris
Thanks for pushing this to the top again for visibility. I appreciate your dedication and communication. Honestly, most people in your position would’ve retired to sip cocktails somewhere scenic. But here you are, still publishing, still building. This community is something special, and that’s thanks to you.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
