Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/pain-points
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ahmed pfp
Ahmed
@0xahmed
Poll - how would gas abstraction look like? 1. Pay gas in any token showcased by the wallet 2. User has individual gas tank which they can use across any l2 3. Dapps sponsor everything 4. All the above - if it’s all the above, what’s the percentage weight between the top 3?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

𝖙𝖊𝖈𝖍𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖘 pfp
𝖙𝖊𝖈𝖍𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖘
@techn1cs.eth
1+3 imo. users should need to do the least amount of work to manage gas. additionally, there may be a fourth option for users to sponsor other users based on their discretion which can potentially help with onboarding non crypto folks. waiting patiently for ERC-4337 to drop 🧘
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ahmed pfp
Ahmed
@0xahmed
Interesting. Definitely see where you’re coming from. 4337 is here as an erc and is in use. The fourth option isn’t built but maybe can be a paymaster functionality cc @livingrock7 or module cc @kurtlarsen.eth
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Kurt pfp
Kurt
@kurtlarsen.eth
Could definitely be a module. We have an executor that allows one account to pay for the gas of another account. This was mainly built for a sub account architecture but could extend to this fourth option with modification
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

𝖙𝖊𝖈𝖍𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖘 pfp
𝖙𝖊𝖈𝖍𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖘
@techn1cs.eth
oh i didn't realize erc-4337 was live. i just kept reading it was in draft mode. but ppl have it implemented as experimental perhaps?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction