Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
So fucking backwards https://decrypt.co/302023/telegram-exclusive-ton-barring-other-networks
13 replies
7 recasts
36 reactions

Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ pfp
Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ
@0--
isn't this also an attempt to keep a handle on the UX tho? Most users won't have a clue what's happening under the hood and a crappy chain could make Telegram seem crap.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
That's a psyop There's a infinite rolodex of tools to ensure user safety on the chains that they just cut out Adding more wallet types would be trivial This is a "this is my playground" arbitrary chain KPI bumping extraction tactic
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ pfp
Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ
@0--
Adding wallet types might be trivial, but how do you keep a handle on cost and performance of the underlying chains, some sort of SLAs? I imagine this'll be typical of web2 meets web3 for the early years of the web2 -> web3 transition. Only when interchain web3 competition heats up will these folks be forced to open up or die...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ pfp
Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ
@0--
how should it work do you think?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction